Sometime last winter I came across Jonathan Harris' Today project. Since that time, I have been enjoying his photos and stories—passing several of them on to friends. Then, in the post dated August 27, 2010 (what follows will make more sense if you read that first), he made a few remarks that really bothered me.
They bothered me not only because I felt they were inaccurate statements about my chosen faith, but also because my spiritual life has become an area I've spent a lot of time diving into this past year and as such, they cut deep.
I was angered by his assuming that these people were "brainwashed into thinking the point of this life is just to prepare for the life that comes next." Yes, they may believe that "there's a better home awaiting in the sky," but that doesn't mean that they believe that the point of this life was to just wait for God to bring them home to it.
I was irritated that he saw Christianity as a marvelous tool for keeping people tame and under control. Yes, there are some Christians who choose to live tame lives. And yes, there are some leaders who claim the Christian faith as their own and use it to try to keep people under control. Just because of those two things though, it doesn't mean that all Christians act like this or abuse the faith in this way.
As I analyzed my frustration more, I came around to seeing that what bothered me the most about his entire post is that he had so quickly judged these people without talking to a single, solitary one of them. Had he talked to them and in that process, saw that they believed what they did simply because that's what some pastor told them to believe and that they lived dull, fruitless lives because of it, well, I couldn't have been upset with him for stating what he did.
But he didn't. Rather than talk to the people who had just given him goosebumps and nearly brought him to tears so that he could understand why they were so jubilant in their singing, he merely tried to look into their eyes so he could judge them without the bias of their actual personal stories getting in the way.
Then I sat with this anger and frustrtion for several days. As I considered this more and more, I realized that I am just as guilty of the things that I was upset with Jonathan for in a different way.
We do this exact same thing in marketing and advertising, quarter after quarter, year after year.
We send out surveys asking people to answer questions they never even think to think about on their own. Then we use this data to justify the decisions we're making to the higher-ups contolling the marketing purse strings and to make ourselves believe we understand how people think about and buy our products and services.
We spend an hour or two in focus group facilities across a few cities with people who buy our products or services and from those brief moments (which are out of these people's natural environments and real lives), we make judgements on what all people who fit their demographic and psychographic profiles are like so that we can create communications and applications and "utilities" that "connect" with them.
As this realization took hold, I lost my steam for being upset with Jonathan and instead, I felt humbled.
By experiencing the frustration and anger of someone making broad, overly presumptive statements about my faith, I was able to see how wrong it has been of me to do these types of things at times in my past about the people I'm supposed to be representing within the agency and to the client.
Now, rather than being angry, I'm thankful for Jonathan's post—and I pray that I remember this the next time I begin to do them again.