culture

Opportunity Is Everywhere

view on YouTube

"Don't look for the next opportunity. The one you have in hand is the opportunity."
Paul Arden, It's Not How Good You Are, It's How Good You Want To Be.

Where most people see a dirty wall (or more likely, don't even notice the wall at all), Paul "Moose" Curtis sees an opportunity to make something better. He sees an opportunity to create art that takes something dingy and turns it into something delightful.

Green Works, or somebody working with them, noticed the reverse graffiti movement and saw an opportunity to bring this great idea forward, along with highlighting some people behind it, by creating the Reverse Graffiti Project.

As a planner, it is part of our job to find opportunity where others see none. For our creatives. For our clients. For our account handlers. For ourselves. For the people we're hoping to connect to our clients' brands.

Always look for opportunity. Always inspire.

The Power of Unexpected Creativity

Earlier this week, while working away on some slides for a presentation, I left the TV going in the background after eating dinner and watching a re-run of Seinfeld. Being "in the zone" I wasn't really paying much attention, but the music to Robert Muraine's performance combined with the laughing and "Oooooh. MY. God!" comments coming out over and over from the judges made me look up half way through his routine. I was instantly transfixed on what I was watching. As soon as it was over, I rewound it and watched it again. And again. Then I tried to find it online to share here.

What I experienced in watching Robert's performance contains a truth about building great brands.

In the previous version of the W+K Web site, Dan Wieden talked about the power of the unexpected creative insight and its ability to take people to a place they didn't think they would go and never would have gone had they followed logic and reason. In Dan's eyes, it is these insights that build some of the world's most powerful brands. They connect brands with people because they cause people to feel something emotional and that feeling was caused by unexpected creativity brought to them by a brand. You certainly can't argue with the success W+K has experienced based on this simple principle.

It's not just true or Wieden and Kennedy though. It is part of what made Cadbury's Gorilla and Sony's Balls spots so powerful. They took simple ideas grounded in the brand (Joy and Colour Like No Other) and brought them to life in unexpected ways. I think this is also why the follow-up ads fell short for many. Given the first for each brand, we now had much higher expectations and rather than surprising and delighting us with something totally different and new, just as they did the first time, the agencies and brands elected to attempt to mirror their previous successes with different executions of the same idea.

Using unexpected creativity is a powerful way to connect with people - no matter if that comes from a brand or an individual. It's something we need more of in today's world of advertising and brand building where so many things seem to have become all too familiar and formulaic.

Weezer Is The Web

Just a little Friday fun courtesy of Weezer and their new Pork and Beans video.

via

Passion + Listening = A Great Brand

Chris Brogan shared this video as an example of how great branded content doesn't come across as an ad and in doing so, it stands a much better chance of getting passed along from one to many. I absolutely agree with him but that's not why I'm posting the video here. Nor is it because of my appreciation for street art and great street artists. The reason I'm sharing it is because of what gets said around 2:43 into the video.

The guys behind Montana actually paint, so they have an inherent feel for what makes great spray paint when it comes to writing graffiti. Not only that, but they also get out and talk to street artists to really understand what they need. Then they go back and develop those things. The entire video shows how Montana has specially formulated their paints and developed a variety of caps so that street artists can create better work.

This is what great brands do. They have passion for what they make and that passion helps them start out with a pretty good product to begin with. Then, they go out and spend time listening to people who use their products and find ways to make them better.

Great brands always consider themselves to be in beta - even if they don't use that term. They're always looking for ways to improve and be more meaningful to the people who use them. In return, this makes the people who use them even more passionate about them. In my book, that's never a bad thing.

--

Side note: Chris also has a good post on thinking about your blog's design. It made me see the real answer to the question I had been asking myself with regard to my recent banner refresh - "Does my blog look fat with this header?" Thus the change to trim it down a bit. Next up is thinning out the sidebars a bit. Have a bit too much going on over there.

BLU | MUTO

Found this animation from BLU just now and thought it was worth sharing here vs. just on my Tumblr.

Enjoy.

via

Who Gets Runners, Better?

Picture_14

A while back, I posted two spots aimed at people who run. One for Nike+. One for New Balance. I left the request fairly open-ended, asking people to let me know what they liked or didn’t like about each, or to compare and contrast them. I especially wanted to hear from people who run.

I did this because I am not a runner, nor do I run. There is no love/hate relationship for me with running. It’s all hate. When someone asks me if I run, I like to use a phrase a friend of mine says when asked the same question, “I only run when chased.”

Why am I telling you this? Because I want to be clear from the start that with me not being a runner, I couldn’t tell you if either of the commercials in question speak to a runner. And that’s why I asked the question I did. With that, here’s what I learned from those of you who responded both in the comments of the post and via Twitter with a few of my own thoughts/hypotheses thrown in...

Real runners actually do have a love/hate relationship with running. There are days when they just don’t want to do it, but they do anyway because they know that afterwards, they’ll feel better for it. Real runners are intrinsically motivated. They don’t run to lose weight or to get in shape for another sport or to stay trim. They don’t run to be a part of a “running community.” They run for themselves. They run to run.

Real runners don’t need something telling them in their ear how far they’ve gone or how much time they have left until they’re done. In fact, they’d rather not have anything to listen to other than the sound of their feet hitting the ground beneath them, their breath hitting the air and the thoughts running through their mind. For real runners, running is personal. New Balance gets this. And while their execution may fall a little flat for some real runners, the idea still resonates.

Nike+ on the other hand doesn’t speak to the real runner. Nike+ speaks to the person who runs, but not because they love running. The person who uses Nike+, from what I can ascertain via the feedback on the commercials, is doing it for some other reason. Possibly to get back in shape. Or to lose five pounds. Or to stay conditioned for another sport. Or maybe to get in some daily exercise in leu of going to the gym.

Therefore, the Nike+ user is more likely to be extrinsically motivated. There is no love/hate relationship with running. It’s mostly hate. This person runs as a means to an end, not because they love running. Because of this, they need extra motivation. They need to feel like they’re part of a larger community to be accountable to. They need music to help them keep a pace and not think about how much they hate what they’re doing at the moment. They need a voice telling them they only have a little bit further to go, only a few more minutes, until the self-inflicted torture ends.

The Nike+ ad follows in the footsteps of Nike’s historical approach to advertising, which is to speak to the inner-athlete in people who aspire to be more/do more than they are currently. By presenting Nike+ in a way that makes it feel like it’s for real runners and is a way of bringing real runners together, they speak to the masses who aspire to be more/do more and are running as a way to achieve this. Real runners look at this ad and scoff. But those who run for some purpose other than for a love of running look at it and say, “I want to be a part of that.” Nike+ makes it easier for the person who runs for external reasons stay with it.

So, there you have it. That’s my take, based on what a few of you told me. New Balance is going after a niche - runners. Nike+ is hitting the masses outside of that niche - people who run. Two different brands/products for two different types of people who run. What do you think? Did I come close? Or did I miss the mark? Runners, what do you have to say?

Required Reading: The Kaiser Edition

Picture_6

I'm not quite sure how it happened, but somewhere along the way, I lost track of what Marcus was writing when he switched over from his old blog to writing The Kaiser Edition.

Thankfully, someone pointed me in the direction of his Content Will Kill Your Agency series either in an email or comment from the Future of Marketing + Advertising post a while back and reminded me of his great blog/site.

In trying to catch up on it all, I feel like he and I are much on the same track of thought in many areas. Even down to the look of our sites/blogs. Although his is much better. If I were to create my own design rather than stay within TypePad's design tools, there's not much I would do different than how he has his set up. Anyway...

Rather than tell you about all the great stuff he's posting, just pop over there and start reading for yourself. Maybe the best/easiest way to start is to go with the "Top Stories" column on the right.

Note to Marcus, a.k.a. The Kaiser: Sorry I lost track for a bit. Definitely back on now and have corrected the oversight of not having a link to you over there in the blogrolls. Thanks for sharing all the great thinking and for always calling bullshit when it's needed.

David Report no. 9 - I Shop Therefore I Am

Davidreport9 David Report has posted their newest issue - "I shop therefore I am." You can read it at their site or it's also available to download for free. The very high-level description:

We are proud to announce the new David Report bulletin called "I shop therefore I am". In this issue we are looking into the world of consumer culture from different point of views; ethical, social, political, economical and humanistic.

Shopping has turned into a lifestyle. We consume as leisure and a way to pass time. But at the same time many are realizing that the power of consumption is stopping us from finding true and sincere happiness; and that shopping often works as a substitute for something that we´re missing in life. At what point does the accumulation of material goods become less fulfilling and more stressful and overwhelming?

Our consumption grows in the same pace as our economic growth. Studies shows that in hundred years we consume eight times as much per capita as today. Can our globe take such a strain? The power of consumption is being questioned and there´s a change in attitude and way of life. We don´t want to be consuming goofs, we want to be considered aware and responsible. It is all about WHAT we buy and WHAT we choose to invest in, the world we live in will be the result of those choices.

In the future consumption will be more about experiences and services than things. Perhaps giving will be more important than having. Are the companies, who survive on our consumption, prepared for this transition?

The David Report bulletin no 9 "I shop therefore I am" also offers insight on the subject from strategist Kristina Dryza and Zen-Buddhist Sante Poromaa. On top of this an interview with Mathilda Tham, guest professor at Beckmans school of Design.

There were a couple things that stood out in particular to me on this. The first was this thought:

In the future consumption will be more about experiences and services than things. Perhaps giving will be more important than having.

To me, this talks to the on-going hot topic of utility and the desire of today's consumers to use products and services that actually do things for them vs. buying brands in an effort to say things about themselves.

This statement goes beyond utility though and talks about supporting brands that make the world a better place, not just our own lives. In this regard, my mind immediately goes to TOMS Shoes, where purchasing a pair of TOMS not only gets you a pair of shoes, but also gives one to a child in need somewhere around the globe.

This is all further cementing the direction things have been moving in for quite some time. Especially with younger shoppers. People are becoming more conscious about what they buy, what went into producing it and what happens to their dollars post-purchase.

More and more people are moving away from buying things to make a statement about who they are; to buying things that give them an experience or help them do something that then shapes who they are and gives them a story to tell.

The evolution of this is going from purchasing products and services that do something only for our own good to supporting products that also do something for others in need or for the betterment of our planet.

The other piece that jumped out at me initially was a block of text in support of Herd:

A classical psychological symptom is also reflected in our shopping, humans are group animals and will do anything to stay in their group. To be excluded means death and to avoid being excluded people do what all other people are doing, in this case shop! Don’t be different, look like everyone else, do like everyone else etc. ...

In thinking about this in relation to the above point, as more and more people begin to shop with a more conscious mind about how they're spending their dollars, others will follow suit. In my mind, this says marketers need to do things with our marketing that supports and informs these changes.

The brands that start helping people feel better about their spending habits and where their money is going are going to get ahead quickly. The brands that continue to be selfish with their marketing and their dollars, or that just try to appear they're doing good? Well, let's just say they won't need their shades in the future.

How can brands do this? By creating experiences for, or sharing experiences with, people. Experiences change behavior. It is through doing and seeing others do things that we learn and change our own actions. We don't often change our behavior simply from hearing or reading words. Hearing and reading are important as reminders, but the the act of doing/experiencing is far stronger.

If you don't believe this, just think to when you hear a mother tell her child, "Don't touch that, it's hot," for the first time. Being that the child has never felt it before, they inevitably touch it to learn for themselves. Then, the next time their mother tells them the same thing, they recall the burn (action) of the first time and refrain from touching it this time.

Anyway... if you are a brand that is doing good with the money people spend on your products, don't stop at telling people you're doing it or going to do it. Show them you're doing it. Invite them to help you. Make them feel as much a part of the experience as possible. Let them decide how much they want to get involved, but give them every opportunity you can to join in.

O.K., I think I've gone on far too long on this one now. Read the report when you have a few free minutes as there are some interesting things in it to consider as you think about the future of marketing and advertising.

Digital Influencing the Real World

Pixelcouch

Threadless has a real-world store. TMZ started appearing on TV.

Now you can buy a couch with fabric inspired by what happens when you zoom in really tight on a digital image.

What other examples have you seen of things from the digital world moving into the real world?

found

Fallon Brainfood: The Social 10

Didn't get around to sharing this one last week, but meant to do it. Sorry about that.

Fallon planner, Aki Spicer, shared his thoughts on 10 Trends Marketers Should Know About Social Networking at the agency's Brainfood lunch both with the agency and beyond by broadcasting live across several social media platforms so that anyone could watch if they were so inclined. Sounds like it went pretty well. Wish I could have caught it live.

Aki starts off with a good quote from William Gibson: "The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."

Much of this is inline with some of what I've shared here throughout various posts and comments elsewhere. If you're following the social media conversations around the blogs, then I would say this is a really good round-up/recap of many of those ideas with some great case studies, quotes and implications to support exactly what he said this is, "a kind of social media 101."

Anyway, give it a go if you're looking for a good perspective on this topic. If you've got comments or thoughts, be sure to leave them for Aki over on the SlideShare or on the Fallon Planning blog post.

What Is This?

My Twitterings...

Search This Blog

Contact Me

Planners and Such

Disclaimer

  • all views expressed on this blog are those of the author alone and do not necessarily represent the views of his company, clients, co-workers, friends, nor family.

Creative Commons

Blog powered by TypePad