Follow-up Note/Preface: This post kind of rambles and roams. It's not well constructed and thought out. I generally don't post "streaming thoughts" like this, but I felt like I should start getting this stuff out in the open and written down more instead of continuing to hold it in the back of my head until it's exactly how I want to say it. It's clear from some of the initial comments that I didn't get at what I am aiming to yet. At least not broadly. We'll get there. I promise.
Thankfully, the comments that are being left are helping me sort through this further and see where it's falling apart. You're helping me find the right way to articulate it. So, thank you to each of you who has taken time to leave a remark, a thought, a link and/or a note. Please continue to share links, thoughts and challenges/questions as it is going to make this better in the end.
Final note/comment - I wasn't trying to say that the future of advertising is literally design and creating products with/for our clients. I do think that's a part of it, but it's not the entire bigger picture/total. I can see how the way this "brain-dump" progressed and the examples that folded in as the thoughts poured out makes it sort of come out that way. A follow-up post will be coming to tighten this down more and clarify what I was working at getting to, but didn't yet. Anyway, with that, continue on if you wish and by all means, keep commenting to push this further...
Came across this just now which led me to this and this. I'm putting Brian Collins' quote here and sharing it as it relates directly to something I've been thinking about for quite some time now.
A couple of those thoughts bubbled up in the comments of a post on Logic + Emotion recently. I guess it's probably time to just post some of them here instead of continuing to wait to write up something more "fully baked."
With that, here we go then on some true "thinking out loud"...
To me, Brian's quote says exactly where advertising needs to head if it is to survive. I've been playing with a thought in my head to capture the essence of the change that needs to take place. It goes something like this:
Advertising creates problems. Design solves them.
Design solves the problems advertising creates.
They're not quite right, but I think they're somewhere close. What I mean by them is this...
Most advertising as it exists today creates problems. Everyone is claiming to be the best, or better, or the fastest, or the newest... and on, and on, and on. Thousands of ads yelling the same basic message for thousands of products. This creates confusion for people. Confusion is a problem. People generally don't like problems. To counter this, we've created filters to block out all the problems we don't need to deal with.
To get rid of the problem for the things we do want or need, we turn to our families, friends and co-workers to see what they think or know from experience. We also turn to the web to look up more information to see what several people, including experts and complete strangers, are saying so that we can find out which one really is the best for what we need. We seek the truth, or as close as we can get to it at least, to clear up the confusion.
What does this mean for your ad? Simply put, if your ad doesn't match what these people say, you're probably not going to fare so well.
Design on the other hand, doesn't try to claim anything, Design doesn't talk. Design, well, it just does. Design sees a problem someone has with something they're using and works to solve it. By making things better or easier or more useful, etc., you create your own advertising. The person who uses the product or service tells others about it because you just made their life a little better.
That confused person above, the one who saw your ad... They're asking the person who is using your competitors redesigned "X" what the truth is and the person using your competitor's "X" has something real to show them and tell them about. Meanwhile, you've got the same old "Y" and a loud ad that creates problems. That doesn't sound like a fun situation if you ask me.
So where does all this go/what does it mean? Good question. I don't have the answer yet, but I've been playing with a thought or two and talking with a few people about them. It feels like this might be on the right track...
The way I've been articulating it, but I don't know if it's the best way of saying it, is, "We're no longer in the business of creating ads. We're in the business of creating experiences."
What this means for agencies is exactly what Brian Collins is talking about. We've got to re-think the process of how we solve problems for our clients. Instead of starting with "what's the main idea we need to communicate,' we need to start with "what is the experience we need to create to change behavior?" As a very wise man keeps pointing out, telling people things doesn't change behavior. Getting them to actually do things does.
What this means for advertising is that your ad needs to draw people into the experience instead of telling people you're the best. Make the ad do something, not just say something. The most recent iPhone ads are good examples here - showing what the phone can do to help make life easier instead of trying to tell you the iPhone is the best phone on the market and/or will make you look cool.
Another great example is the TV spot for the new Dyson Ball vacuum where James Dyson demonstrates the "steering" problem with conventional vacuum cleaners due to their being on four wheels that are only able to roll forwards and backwards and then showing his solution, putting the vacuum cleaner on a ball so it can pivot on a dime.
(Tried to find the spot so I wouldn't have to describe it, but couldn't. Sorry. If you know where it is, please let me know and I'll put it here instead.) Linked above (TV Spot) now, thanks to Camilla from Dyson sharing the link in the comments.
As for the Dyson example, they're taking the entire experience of using their vacuums very seriously - always looking for ways to improve and rethink them and then actually doing something with what they learn. How is it working for them? They've been cleaning house on the competition for some time now. (Bad pun intended.)
Another good example of this is BMW. For years they've been all about selling the ultimate driving experience. This begins with the car and how they design and engineer every aspect of it. They think about the driver and what they can do to make driving a BMW a truly special experience. They then use the advertising to give you a hint at what that experience is like. BMW Films took this to an entirely new level.
All three of these examples put the user experience first and foremost and then they build the advertising around that experience. Sure, it helps that all three of these products have an inherent "coolness" factor built into them, (I never thought I'd be calling a vacuum cool, but the Dyson kind of is...) but as the presentation I posted touched on, you don't have to have a cool product to create a great experience around the product. You can do things with your marketing that add value to the product or service, making a better overall experience for people.
Anyway, the point is that as an industry, we have to stop thinking about things like traditional advertising people. We need to start thinking about things like designers, engineers, architects and the like. We need to think about the action we want people to take and what will be required to make that action happen. We can't just think about what we want to tell people. Odds are, telling someone to do something won't be effective alone, if at all. Today's congested media landscape requires a lot more than a campaign built on 30-second TV ads with a heavy media buy to create any real change. It's in creating total experiences that we will see success.
And with that, I'll stop for now. More to come on this later, I'm sure. I didn't expect it to go as far as it did already.
Side note: I don't have time to keep going anyway. I've got to run my Sunday errands now since I'll be going to see Bon Iver tonight when I normally do them. If you haven't heard him and you like Nick Drake, José González and others in that vein, be sure to check him out. He's not exactly like those artists, but if that style/genre of music suits you, then I think you'll like what Justin is doing.
Could not agree more. In fact, I had written a similarly titled piece "Design Is The New Advertising" for MP Daily Fix back in Dec. 07. (Not remotely suggesting your cribbed it, but rather quite pleased that someone else is tooting the same horn.)
Posted by: Toad | April 13, 2008 at 06:24 PM
I agree that design should have more importance on advertising. But how does it aim for more abstract needs (and i'm quoting Maslow here) like esteem and self-actualization.
Isn't design more appropriate to tangible experiences, with advertising filling the loopholes on aemotional scarceness ?
On short, design is our road and advertising the landscape. As long as brands don't forget we're behind the wheel, it's a hell of a ride.
Posted by: Armando Alves | April 13, 2008 at 06:45 PM
Just to be contrarian - it's Monday. Wasn't design the original driver of early advertising and aren't we seeing the pendulum swing the other way.
Ever diminishing incremental improvements by different manufacturers led to communication overload and competition whereby most of the time we're now just selling the same stuff in different ways
As we overdose on this to the point of saturation where any watch a person desires can be purchased in nearly all corners of the planet the necessity for real design is starting to make itself heard.
Look at what an excess of production and incentivised competition makes: Its insane!
Posted by: Charles | April 13, 2008 at 07:05 PM
Nodding my head... lately, even the best anthem spots feel antiquated.
Isn't this all part of the branded utility, marketing as service, experience economy, etc., conversation... and evidenced by the rise of online?
what if the industry brief is: anything we make or influence or do (anthem 60 included) should have enough value to justify its existence in the world?
Meanwhile, there's Phillipe Starck and his "design is dead" tantrum a few weeks ago... While he doesn't bill himself as an experience designer I do agree we're full-up on disposable-chic toilet paper holders.
Posted by: Julie Kucinski | April 13, 2008 at 09:11 PM
Nice to know Tangerine Toad (hello again, remember me?) is only a year behind Gobé. Don't worry, Toad. You can't accuse anyone of cribbing anything here.
"Design is the new advertising." January 2007 - http://blog.rebang.com/?p=1140
And Julie might want to read the full translation of Starck's interview and perhaps read some of the comments over on Bruce Nussbaum's blog (understanding that "design" means different things depending on with whom one is speaking). Some of us (D)esigners agree with the sentiment he's trying to express.
Posted by: csven | April 13, 2008 at 10:03 PM
Don't talk the talk, walk the walk. Simple as that isn't it.
If you create service, product or experience and your approach isn't people-centered, surely you're going to get into trouble. Those people, they're your audience, it's gotta be about them.
Posted by: Charlie Gower | April 14, 2008 at 05:06 AM
Great quote at the head of the piece. The truth is, advertising is all about experience and while strategy is critical for determining direction, design is equally critical for execution. Both elements must sit at the head of the table. Coincidentally, I posted a similar thought this weekend after having spent some time talking to the future generation of brand communicators from the VCU Brandcenter: http://mybackchannel.blogspot.com/2008/04/geek-shall-inherit-earth.html.
Posted by: Linda Ziskind | April 14, 2008 at 08:02 AM
we tend to think design as advertising are similar. your post clearly thinks that. design is communication and advertising is persuasion.
to communicate an idea you first need to persuade people to want to listen to you or buy your product. for example, you design a menu at restaurant so people can find the food they feel like having best, but advertising helps the restaurant owner to bring people to his restaurant. i just don't see design being able to replace Ads, they do very different things, they compliment one another.
another thing, what ever problems we have with advertising is because it has become interruptive, we have serious issues, i agree, but instead of turning a blinding eye on it we need to find a way to fix it and replacing it with design is not the answer.
i've been in both advertising and design ... i'm now in strategy and branding which deals with both ... in my opinion you've miss understood the industry.
Posted by: Bam Azizi | April 14, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Thank you very much for your feedback, links and comments.
I want to clarify something that didn't come through as this was a flowing stream of thought into the blog and not a planned-out/carefully crafted post/article.
I don't think design should replace advertising. I don't think advertising should become design. I do think advertising has a lot to learn from design that we have either forgotten or never learned.
That is where the future of this series of posts is headed. As I tried to say throughout the post, this is a thought in progress and not a final idea.
What I hoped people would focus on more got convoluted by putting too many tangential streams of thought around it. Lesson learned. Stay focused.
The pieces I will try to focus it in on next time are this:
... Anyway, the point is that as an industry, we have to stop thinking about things like traditional advertising people. We need to start thinking about things like designers, engineers, architects and the like. We need to think about the action we want people to take and what will be required to make that action happen. We can't just think about what we want to tell people. ...
... We've got to re-think the process of how we solve problems for our clients. Instead of starting with "what's the main idea we need to communicate,' we need to start with "what is the experience we need to create to change behavior?" ...
Sorry for the confusion and I'll work to be more focused in future posts.
Thank you again for all the thoughts, challenges and links. I really do appreciate the further thinking you're making me do. Keep them coming!
Posted by: paul isakson | April 14, 2008 at 12:57 PM
If it's any consolation, those were the points that stood out to me the most, perhaps as a result of me being a tad jaded with rigid, formulaic problem solving forms and processes at the moment. I don't want to always go planner > creative > design. I want to cut straight to design, and then back again, or not, or bring in an architect or sculptor if I want to. I want the idea to sometimes be the way you engage with what would normally be the idea, in a rigid structure.
'The main idea to communicate' is fraught with problems. I just want a challenge, or a desired end result. Let me get there any which way I want...
Posted by: Angus | April 14, 2008 at 03:13 PM
Go find the original Veg-a-Matic commerical. The one shot with the guy who was brought right off the AC boardwalk and into the studio. It's exactly what you're talking about. It was shot in black&white. It was shot with drippy authenticity because, well, it was authentic. The model exists. It hasn't changed. Get to know your neighbor. Find out what problem they have. Come up with a solution. Demonstrate it in a charming, engaging way. Call it the iPhone. Or the Veg-a-matic. Or the Dyson. Or..Whatever's Next.
We spend too much time analyzing and slapping hyphenated, important sounding labels on our navels. Old school is good school. It's honest. It's unvarnished. It's unhyphenated. At the center of it is the customer -- honored and respected. That's what's too often missing. The honor and respect. Find that in your self and you'll find your connection.
Posted by: Crawford | April 16, 2008 at 07:21 AM
I tend to agree with Crawford, in that various mental constructs are blinding people to the real issues at hand. I posted a short rant about it over here: http://tinyurl.com/5mlkm6
Posted by: Tom Asacker | April 16, 2008 at 03:33 PM
Paul, you can see the Dyson ad here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_9nsWJ6QbE
Thanks for the kind words, good to hear that someone thinks we're doing it right!
Posted by: Camilla Dyson | April 23, 2008 at 07:24 AM
The future of advertising is lovertising (ideas that spread love :)
Posted by: xgeronimo | May 15, 2008 at 11:24 AM